
Throughout
the years, I’ve heard various questions asked about foreign
missions. In fact,
I’ve had to work through some of them myself! For me personally
as a missionary, and for us collectively as a mission-minded
church, there are real and legitimate questions that we need
to answer if we are going to keep focusing on world missions.
Here are a few…
? Isn’t all Christian outreach
really ‘missions’?
? Is there any difference between
‘unsaved’ and ‘unreached’, aren’t they all simply lost?
? Is it reasonable or advisable for people to pull
up stakes and move across the world, to raise their
family in less-than-ideal
circumstances for the sake of missions?
? Is it good stewardship to spend so much of God’s
money on missions?
? Should we focus on the needs of the world if we haven’t
met all the needs of our own church or community?
? Every soul is equally precious to God, so how can
we put priority on any group of souls?
In essence, these 6 questions (and others like them) are addressing
the same issue. So, as this article doesn’t give us space or
time to answer them individually, let’s attempt to consolidate
them into one…
When there is so much to do here at home,
and all souls are equal, and it is much more cost-effective
and safe to do ‘home
missions’, why should we put priority on foreign missions?
I guess this article is really a follow-up
to a message/article I shared 5 years ago entitled, “The
Priority of the Unreached”.
As the title implies, I suggested that those who have never
heard the gospel should receive priority in our ministry
focus (based on Rom. 15:20-21).
But how can any soul have ‘priority’? “God
is no respecter of persons,” (Acts 10:34) and we know that
it is not his
will that any should perish but “that all should
come to repentance.” (2 Pet 3:9) So can we use the word ‘priority’ with regard
to souls?
Let’s bring the whole dilemma right down to
where we live in the following hypothetical, but very real-to-life
scenario…
John is a great blessing in his home church
and its local ministries. He will likely be ordained in the
near future
as a minister. Then John hears about an unreached
tribe,
the Naba
people of North Africa. There are no known Christians
among them. Why should he sell his possessions, ask
his church
to financially support him, spend 3 years learning
another language,
raise his family in difficult circumstances, and
risk everything spending 10-15 years just to see a handful
of Naba tribesmen
converted? How can he justify that? If he stays ‘home’,
he will likely be more ‘effective’ and certainly
more
cost-efficient in his ministry. So why should any
certain group of souls
(in this case the Naba) get priority over any other
souls (in this
case John’s home area/local church)?
We need to know the will of God on this vitally
important subject. Whom should we focus on? How do we prioritize?
What is God’s
will for his church in ministering to the needs
of
the world?
“2 Wills” of God
I believe God’s will is revealed to us in
2 ways – His desire and His directive. For now, we’ll
call them
His
“2 wills.”
This might not be a theologically correct term,
but bear with me as I try to explain what I
mean. It’s
really
not that difficult,
because we have “2 wills” ourselves.
For example, it may be your will (desire) to see all of your sons become carpenters. However,
you
may have
another
kind
of will (directive) that orders how your
inheritance will be divided among those same sons if you
were to die.
Your first will, your desire for your sons
to choose carpentry as an occupation, is
dependent upon many
outside factors
including your sons’ inclinations, other
people’s input in their lives,
and so on; though you can certainly have
some effect on it. Your second will, your
directive as to what
happens with
your inheritance, is not dependant on or
even subject to
other people’s
input or decisions, but must be carried
out as
you directed in your will.
Now let’s look at God’s “2 wills” in reference
to the priority of souls.
God’s Desire
The oft-quoted and very precious passage
of scripture from 2 Pet 3:9 says
that “God is
not willing
that any should
perish but [He is willing] that all should come to repentance.”
God wants all people to be saved! This
holy desire of God must be one
of the most beautiful
aspects
of His
character.
It’s
overwhelming to think that out
of billions of souls, God is personally and passionately
interested
in
each and every
one.
As fellow-workers together with
God, we share His passionate desire. We
can reduce
this
desire to
a very simple
statement – God wants as many people
as possible to be saved.
So, does any soul or group of souls have ‘priority’? If we
were to answer that question based on God’s desire in 2 Pet
3:9 alone, we would have to come to the following conclusion:
To leave a known area of fruitful ministry and go half way
across the globe, putting priority on an unknown area where
the results may or may not be fruitful is not in keeping with
God’s desire for as many people as possible to be saved.
But, we must remember that 2 Pet 3:9 is God’s
desire, not His directive. We understand from many other
passages in scripture
that all will not come to repentance, but some, tragically,
will refuse and be lost for eternity.
God's Directive
On the other hand, Mark 13:10 gives us God’s
directive or the second part of His will. This is something
to
which He
is steadfastly
committed. It is unalterable. Here it is – “And the
gospel must first be published among all
nations.” The same
directive is re-worded in Matt 24:14 – “And
this gospel of the kingdom
shall be preached in all the world for a witness unto
all nations; and then shall the end come.” To top it all
off,
we even get
a sneak-preview into the culmination of the world and
the beginning of eternity in heaven and we find that this
second
part of
God’s will, His directive, absolutely WILL be fulfilled! “After
this I beheld, and, lo, a great multitude, which no man
could
number, of all nations, and kindreds, and people, and
tongues, stood before the throne, and before the Lamb…” (Rev
7:9)
But perhaps nowhere in Scripture is this great
directive of God more unmistakable than in the Great Commission.
“Go ye
therefore and make disciples of all nations.” That
is
not poetry or literature; it is a piercing command
– a very
clear directive.
The Konkomba Bible reads like this – “Go! To
every clan and make them my followers.” If you hosted a five-course
dinner
for a visiting dignitary, and he stated that he wanted
to sample everything, you would not fulfill his wishes
until
you had
given him at least a spoonful of each and every dish,
right? That may be a crude illustration, but God’s
directive is
just that simple – we must enlist disciples of Jesus
from each and
every nation, each and every tribe. (The Greek word
for ‘nation’ is ETHNOS = a race, a tribe, nation, people)
Now we can summarize the “2 wills” of God:
- God’s desire is for as
many souls as possible to be saved.
- God’s directive is that some souls from every
nation must be saved.
Let’s pause for a minute. Those 2 sentences
are easy to read, but profoundly sobering to consider.
Please
read
them again.
Now, based on God’s revealed will, His desire and directive, let us re-examine our original
question
and our hypothetical
scenario. Do the Naba people get priority?
Should a brother like John move out to an
unreached field even
if it is
not as cost-effective or efficient when there
is plenty to do
‘at home’?
The answer may be a bit complex. One local
church cannot meet the needs of all the
unreached people
groups in
the world.
But the local church can and must embrace
the obligation of God’s directive and
prioritize those groups.
The over-arching theme and focus of the
church’s ministry
strategy should
be
guided by God’s some-souls-from-every-nation mandate. Our ministry choices must be based, not
solely on efficiency or close proximity
– but on
the directive.
This means that those nations (tribes/ethnic
groups) like the Naba of North Africa
in which there are
few or NO disciples
represent not only a pitiful situation,
but an emergency condition
directly opposed to God’s directive to the Church. At best this is a tragedy,
at worst
it is disobedience on
our part
as God’s Church to carry out His directive.
These ethnic groups with few to no
disciples (also
called ‘unreached
people groups’)
must move front and center in our agenda,
both individually and collectively
as churches. We have to renovate
and re-evaluate our entire lives as
we prioritize this
emergency condition.
Our response to these ‘unreached’ groups
must
move beyond “Oh, that’s a pity!” to
“God, forgive us!
We will do
whatever it
takes to fulfill Your directive!” Only
in that state of mind will be ready
to do something
about the thousands
of unreached
ethnic groups still in the world today.
My dearly beloved brothers and sisters,
let us be of one heart! I do not
consider myself
to
have apprehended
this
issue (see
Phil 3:12). My being a “missionary”
really doesn’t change anything. We
all must
face the facts –
those unreached
people are still
out there. My “Jerusalem” might have
changed from Ephrata,
PA to Katani, Ghana, but there are
still a lot of “uttermost parts of
the earth”
with no disciples.
I am standing
with you, hand-in-hand, as we look
at this awesome reality. Together,
we must
answer
some
serious
questions
and come
to grips with
what those answers mean to us as individuals
and churches.
? Is the directive fulfilled yet – are there disciples of
Jesus in every ethnic group? No.
? Then who is responsible for the unfinished job? We are.
? Should this unfinished directive get priority in our lives
and ministries? _____ (you decide)
? What is our part, what is my part in fulfilling this directive?
Will you get on your knees with me to find
the answer to that last question?
Click
the icon to download or print this article.
You will need Adobe®
Reader® software installed on your computer in order to view this file.
(Adobe, the Adobe PDF file icon and Reader are either
registered trademarks or trademarks of Adobe Systems Incorporated in the United
States and/or other countries.)
|